Monday, January 30, 2012

Some Opinions on SOPA...

As of recent, the Internet has become flooded with complaints and rallies to make sure the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) isn’t passed in the United States.  But what are the economic factors that are put into place by the US government’s actions to allow for a more effective anti-piracy system. 

George Mankiw stated his opinion about SOPA on the 19th of January via his blog, stating that the complaints by the majority online are missing a very crucial point on what SOPA plans to target.   Intellectual property is the factor that many seem to grasp that, even though certain music and movies may be online, there isn’t legal permission to have this material available to the public for free.  Mankiw creates a great example with tangible goods, “In a free society, you don’t have a right to steal from your neighbor’s property.  And that should include intellectual property” (Mankiw). 

A couple days later, the Economist released an article discussing the reaction of the public when many websites shut down in protest of SOPA, including Wikipedia and Reddit.  Google and other websites showed their disapproval by blacking out their logo linked to the description of SOPA.  The article mentions the dispute between the rights of intellectual property, but also the acts of government officials and what they want to do to effectively make (or break) SOPA.  The most inspirational was by Darrell Issa of the Judiciary Committee, who hopes to reach out to the community to create a balanced act to allow for some protection of intellectual properties, but still uphold copyrights and avoid piracy in America.

So what are the economic effects that are imposed by SOPA?  For one, if intellectual property can be protected, many industries will have a chance to reap the benefits that piracy has cut into.  The music and film industry would be two that would heavily enjoy SOPA, as the level of piracy would be immediately broken.  The costs would also put a hit on potential creativity by citizens of the United States. If one needed the proper copyrights to express certain viewpoints via a podcast, there could be a drop in the level of human capital.  However, this is not certain, and in my personal opinion, do not believe this will effect human capital.

While many may argue that SOPA will destroy all freedom of speech and the rights to public goods via the Internet, I am not totally succumbing to the degree that SOPA will harm society.  If what I have read is correct, the limitations on many currently free goods would still likely be able to be accessed, but in a controlled state.  The music industry would have to be completely off base to get rid of the current state of allowing for music to be streamed online.  The amount of buzz that can be created on the Internet is amazing.  The benefits, while not monetary initially, allows for people to test out what they may buy.  The costs of cutting that off could limit the levels of exposure a musician would receive, but as long as there is approval via copyrights, the music should still be available on the Internet (along with other goods).

I would like to close on the bit on what may occur to human capital if SOPA were to be enabled.  As I have learned in many of my economics courses, I am as much of a good and can offer services just the same as an apple or a computer may offer another human being.  Arguments that are sure to come up with protecting intellectual property are holding back learning and growth within society.  But to me, this is somewhat skewed.  The problem in my opinion wouldn’t be the inability to access Wikipedia; the reason being is that even with all the free knowledge available, the growth in human capital hasn’t found growth among youth over the last decade.  Critical thinking is down, and that goes off on a whole new topic of whether we as a society are holding students accountable for the proper knowledge necessary to succeed in the future. 

I am extremely interested in seeing the outcome of SOPA.  I plan to read more into the actual process that may occur, but based off the two articles I have read (and outside information), SOPA could use some work.  Once fixed up, perhaps through Donald Issa’s approach, we could see a balanced act that protects copyrights yet still hosts the benefits of what the Internet offers today.
                          
References:
  1. Mankiw, Greg. “On SOPA”. Greg Mankiw’s Blog. http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2012/01/on-sopa.html
  2. “Stopping SOPA”. The Economist. http://www.economist.com/node/21543173      

No comments:

Post a Comment