The
logic behind tuition raises still remains questionable. Why would it make sense to raise monetary
values of a college education and push out potential highly capable students
who may not be able to afford the tuition?
As
I argued in a past entry, there is a problem with institutions raising prices
to create any form of competitive edge or selectiveness. Limiting human capital is the worst things a
country can have occur.
In
this case, the tuition raises are coming due to a perception by large
corporations only considering students for employment from a select list of
schools. While this makes sense for
convenience, the truth is that historical experience may support choosing
candidates from these schools. But Frank
states the need to bump up the competitive level of these schools via tuition
is unnecessary.
In
my belief, there shouldn’t even be a high effect. Coming from a school that is likely not in
the highest tier of the chosen universities, the development in my human
capital has grown similar to the state that I have seen from my former high
school peers. I reiterate that there is
a benefit for corporations to target select schools for the convenience factor,
but truly the corporations are likely missing out on maximum growth with their
candidate selections.
The
situation goes back to the ability to efficiently skill match for positions
around the United States. I believe the
first step to improving the matching process is to avoid limiting human
capital. Let’s hope that Frank’s message
to the top tier universities stop the rising costs in tuition.
Reference:
- Frank, Robert. “The Prestige Chase is Raising College Costs”. NY Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/11/business/college-costs-are-rising-amid-a-prestige-chase.html?_r=1
- King, Stephen. “Should We Break Up Our Universities”. CoRE Economics. http://economics.com.au/?p=8388
No comments:
Post a Comment